SpaceX'in Birleşmesinden Sonra OpenAI'nin İmleç Erişimini Kesmesiyle Altman - Musk Kavgası Arttı

Altman-Musk Feud Escalates as OpenAI Cuts Off Cursor Access After SpaceX Merger

Rich Duprey

Sat, August 29, 2026 at 6:05 PM GMT+3 4 min read

SPCX +0.45%

Quick Read

OpenAI revoked Cursor's API access after SpaceX's $60 billion acquisition, citing Musk's pattern of contract violations, though OpenAI served just 5% of traffic.
SpaceX's Colossus clusters, targeting 1 million H100 equivalents, now power Cursor's $4 billion revenue base, eliminating dependence on rival AI suppliers.
Analysts set a $219 average price target on SpaceX, representing over 50% upside, as AI vertical integration mirrors the playbook that collapsed launch costs.
Act now: the analyst who called NVIDIA in 2010 just named his top 10 AI stocks — and SpaceX didn't make the cut. Grab the names FREE today.

The long-running dispute between OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Elon Musk has simmered for years, rooted in Musk's exit from the AI lab he co-founded and his subsequent legal and public challenges over its direction. That rivalry just moved from boardroom barbs to operational consequences.

Maja Hitij / Getty Images News via Getty Images

On Friday, OpenAI cut off model access for Cursor after SpaceX (NASDAQ:SPCX) completed its $60 billion acquisition of the coding platform, turning a personal and philosophical clash into a concrete test of control over AI infrastructure.

The Compute Advantage at the Center

OpenAI threw shade at Musk, directly naming him as the reason behind its decision:

"We are making this choice because we cannot be confident that SpaceX will use our technology within our terms of service, based on our experience with Elon Musk's companies violating contracts."

Beyond the drama, though, the real story sits in SpaceX's Colossus clusters. The system seeks to scale to the equivalent of 1 million Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA) H100 chips. That hardware is the bottleneck Cursor itself flagged before the deal: the coding tool needed massive dedicated compute to train competitive models of its own.

Act now: the analyst who called NVIDIA in 2010 just named his top 10 AI stocks — and SpaceX didn't make the cut. Grab the names FREE today.

By owning both the compute and now the application layer that reaches expert software engineers, SpaceX is running the same vertical-integration playbook it used to drive launch costs from roughly $10,000 per kilogram down toward $100. Cursor brought roughly $4 billion in annualized revenue at the time of the acquisition at a 15-times multiple. Folding that distribution into Colossus removes reliance on rival labs and turns a potential supplier risk into an owned asset.

Ironically, OpenAI's decision accelerates rather than derails that plan. Cursor can still route developers to their own OpenAI API keys or other providers in the interim, and Anthropic has already signaled increased Claude support. Yet future OpenAI models, including the forthcoming Astra, stay off the table. That pushes SpaceX harder toward proprietary Grok-powered coding agents trained on its own iron.

Even so, SpaceX says that OpenAI serve about 5% of Cursor user traffic, and it is working with OpenAI to resolve the dispute.

What the Numbers Say for SpaceX Shareholders

SpaceX closed at $141.50 on Friday, giving it a market capitalization of about $1.92 trillion, up from $1.77 trillion at its June 12 IPO. The $60 billion Cursor purchase represented roughly 2% to 3% dilution depending on the exact share-price timing. Analysts tracking the name put average price targets near $219, implying more than 50% upside from recent levels, with revenue-growth forecasts exceeding 100% over three years in some models.

Compare that to pure-play AI peers that still rent compute. SpaceX already monetizes excess capacity to outside customers while keeping the densest clusters for internal use. Cursor's developer dataset -- edit histories, completions, agent traces -- now feeds directly into those clusters. In short, the feud removes one external dependency and strengthens the case that SpaceX's AI segment can scale without margin leakage to competitors.

Granted, integration risks exist. Cursor users may grumble during the transition, and execution on proprietary models is never guaranteed. That said, SpaceX has repeatedly converted ambitious hardware timelines into operational reality. The $10 billion alternative fee in the original April partnership terms shows both sides priced the compute relationship as valuable either way.

Key Takeaway

Smart investors should view the OpenAI cutoff as confirmation that SpaceX's ownership of Colossus-scale compute plus a leading coding interface creates durable optionality in AI. The $60 billion all-stock deal already embeds Cursor's $4 billion run-rate into a $1.92 trillion platform.

Long-term investors who believe vertical integration will compound the same way launch costs did now have clearer evidence the strategy is in motion. Short-term noise around the feud is real, yet the underlying asset -- owned compute powering an owned application layer -- remains the more important signal.